Do you have comments, questions, or feedback? Would you like to see some more guidance about a particular evidence synthesis topic or method? Complete our survey!
Librarians can be a major asset in the evidence synthesis process, and are associated with higher quality reviews (see Meert, et al. or Rethlefsen, et al.). Consulting with a librarian or including one on your author team is recommended by institutions like JBI and Covidence. You can also get support from the Evidence Synthesis Graduate Specialist.
The NBL Social Sciences Librarian (Julia Maxwell) can offer two tiers of support to fit your project needs: consultation and collaboration. Our evidence synthesis graduate specialist is also available for support.
The librarian can guide, provide advice, or teach elements of the evidence synthesis process. Some examples of how a librarian might be able to help in a consulting capacity would be to:
(Adapted from Cornell University Libraries' Evidence Synthesis Service Model)
The librarian can also collaborate with a research team. In this model, the librarian fully joins the review team as a co-author, and is usually responsible for drafting and translating search strategies, and writing the the methods section of an article.
Please be aware that there is one librarian that provides evidence synthesis services for all social science disciplines at Rutgers, and Systematic Review tasks are time and resource-intensive processes. Therefore, librarian capacity for collaboration is on a limited and case-by-case basis.
Feel free to Ask Julia if you have any questions about how a librarian can support your evidence synthesis project!
Review Step | Tasks | Consultation | Collaboration (on a limited and case-by-case basis) |
---|---|---|---|
Pre-Review | Guidance on ES process, types of reviews, methods, and steps | X | X |
Searching for completed or upcoming reviews in topic area. | Will provide guidance, but will not search directly | X | |
Development of Eligibility Criteria | Support developing review topic and choosing review type | X | X |
Guidance on study types to include/exclude | X | X | |
Protocol Creation and Registration | Guidance on protocol registration in OSF, PROSPERO, etc. | X | X |
Searching | Guidance on where to search (what databases, registers, etc) | X | X |
Instruction on search methods | X | X | |
Instruction in screening software use | X | X | |
Creation and translation of search strategy | will give feedback and support on search strings, but not outright create them | X | |
Documentation of search strategy | X | ||
Management of search results | X | ||
Study Selection and Extraction | Data extraction instruction and guidance | X | X |
Writing and Publishing | Writing of methods section | X | |
Creation of PRISMA diagram | X | ||
Writing of search strategies for publication | X | ||
Librarian contribution warrants acknowledgement in published review (if team is comfortable giving it) | X | ||
Librarian contributions warrant co-authorship | X |