About Cochrane
The Cochrane Collaboration is an international, non-profit, independent organization that publishes systematic assessments of evidence of the effects of healthcare interventions. Cochrane systematic review authors follow a published procedure that has become the gold standard for systematic reviews of interventions.
To learn more about how the Cochrane Collaboration works see the Cochrane Collaboration Newcomer's Guide.
Cochrane Oral Health Group
The Cochrane Oral Health Group focuses on producing systematic reviews covering "the prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of oral, dental and craniofacial diseases and disorders."
Cochrane Library
The Cochrane Library provides full-text access to Cochrane protocols and reviews. Off-campus access is restricted Rutgers people with NetID's.
Cochrane Review citations are included in the ADA Evidence Database and are indexed in PubMed.
Log into PubMed
Finding Dental Journals
Use Journal filters, select Dental Journals.
Finding Meta-analysis
Finding Systematic Reviews
Finding Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Finding Cohort Studies
Finding Case-Control Studies
A well formed clinical question covers the following 4 areas identified by the acronym PICO.
Patient or population or problem
Intervention or exposure or prognostic factor
Comparison (not always included)
Outcome
Applying PICO to a Sample Question
Will an adult patient with sleep bruxism find that an occlusal splint reduces jaw muscle discomfort?
Patient / population / problem: Adult with sleep bruxism
Intervention: Occlusal Splints
Comparison: No treatment
Outcome: Reduce pain
Sample Search
Clearly articulating all parts of the question will help you conduct a comprehensive search.
Make sure that words for each part of the PICO question are in the search:
Adult AND Sleep Bruxism AND Occlusal Splints AND Pain
Searching is an iterative process. The results from your first set of search terms can help you identify additional related terms:
Adult AND Sleep Bruxism AND (Occlusal Splints OR Mandibular Advancement) AND (Pain OR Headache)
Categories of clinical questions
Etiology / Harm: identifying associations, risk factors and causes of a disease
Diagnosis: selecting tests that accurately detect a disease
Therapy / Prevention: selecting effective interventions to treat or prevent a disease
Prognosis: predicting the probable outcome of a disease or treatment
Sample questions for clinical question categories
Etiology / Harm: Are teenagers who frequently drink soda at risk for developing dental caries?
Diagnosis: What is the best method that dentists can use to identify early carious lesions?
Therapy / Prevention: Should teenagers and young adults with asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth have them removed?
Prognosis: How long will a dental implant last in an adult patient with no periodontal disease?
Study design methods for clinical question categories
Researchers select the study design to match the kind of clinical question being asked and the level of knowledge about the question that already exists. Identifying the type of question being asked and the type of research that would best answer the question will help you focus the search on the highest level of evidence.
Etiology / Harm: Randomized control trial, cohort, case-control, cross-sectional
Diagnosis: Comparison to a reference standard with report of sensitivity/specificity
Therapy / Prevention: Randomized control trial, cohort, case-control, case series
Prognosis: Cohort, case-control, case series
Once you have found systematic reviews or clinical research articles related to your question you must critically evaluate the research and how it is reported. Even a Cochrane systematic review should be read critically!
Critical appraisal is the process of reading research papers with an focus on:
Articles about of critically appraising dental research
Meta-analysis
"Meta-analysis is a tool by which small, related studies are identified and, through systematic review, are combined into a common data pool for a single, larger population analysis."
Systematic Reviews
"Systematic reviews summarize and synthesize the available evidence related to diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and harm for clinicians, patients, and decision makers. Such reviews represent one of the most powerful tools to translate knowledge into action."
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
"At the level of primary studies, RCTs represent the optimal study design to address questions of therapy. An RCT is an experiment assessing a medical treatment in patients. In an RCT, participants are allocated randomly into 2 or more groups that are treated equally except for the intervention the participants receive"
Cohort Study
"A cohort study is one in which a group of subjects, selected to represent the population of interest, is studied over time."
Case-Control Study
"Like cohort studies, the purpose of case-control studies is to establish association between exposure to risk factors and disease. Unlike cohort studies, however, members of the population with the disease are selected into the study at the outset and risk factor information is collected retrospectively"
Hierarchy of evidence for clinical questions related to therapy, prevention, etiology or harm.
Always start an EBD search looking for the highest level of evidence. If a meta-analysis is not available on the topic, look next for systematic reviews without statistical synthesis, next for randomized control trials, next for cohort studies, next for case control studies, etc.
For more detailed information about the levels of evidence see the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine - Levels of Evidence (March 2009).
© , Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Rutgers is an equal access/equal opportunity institution. Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to direct suggestions, comments, or complaints concerning any accessibility issues with Rutgers websites to accessibility@rutgers.edu or complete the Report Accessibility Barrier / Provide Feedback form.