Skip to Main Content

Physics Seminar - Spring 2024 (21:750:492)

This guide was created for Dr. Lucien Dupuy's class - Spring 2024

How to Evaluate Sources

You must evaluate all sources that you find - yes, even those found on library shelves or within the library’s databases!  So, what do you need to look for?

· Currency: publication dates can be important depending on whether you are doing a historical study or need to find the most recent information about your topic

· Relevancy: is the resource relevant to your topic (and the parameters of your assignment)?

· Authority: are the authors/editors/publishers considered credible and reliable?

o What are their credentials? 

o Are they considered experts in the field?  Do other scholars cite them?

· Accuracy: is the information valid?

o Do other sources say the same thing?

o What supporting evidence (e.g., references) is provided?

· Purpose: consider who the intended audience might be and how this could affect how the information is presented

o What is the context in which the information was created?

· Objectivity: could there be biases that might have an effect on the information presented?

o Who is funding/sponsoring the study?

o What are the author/editor’s affiliations?  Is it possible that political viewpoints and/or religious beliefs might affect their objectivity?

o Is there balanced coverage, where all aspects of the subject are discussed to the same level of detail?

o Is it just-the-facts being presented or an interpretation of the facts?

o Are assumptions or opinions being made without supporting evidence?

 


Also consider - is it "good" research?  Think about the following... 

o Design of study:  is the design appropriate to the problem/question being studied? 

o Data Collectors:  how qualified were they?

o Sampling:  how many "subjects" were studied and how were they chosen?

o Statistics:  how sound is the approach/method used?

     o Bias:  in sampling, due to sponsorship of research, etc.


TIP:  The general rule of thumb has been that .gov (and most .edu) Web sites are usually reliable; however, you should evaluate those just as you would the .org and .com sites!


Click on the links below for more information about evaluating information sources:

Evaluating Sources: Review Articles

Currency

  • When was the review article published?
    • Unless you are taking a historical perspective, your review articles should ideally be published within the past 5 years.

  • Are there more recent review article(s) on your topic?
    • Make sure you look at those, too!

TIP: If the most recent review article for your topic is more than a year or two old, make sure to look at a few very recent research articles – there may be important new research you will want to be aware of.

Relevance

  • Is the review article focused on your topic?
  • Does the review articles meet the parameters of your assignment?

TIP: Reference your assignment instructions frequently – you want to ensure you are selecting sources that meet the requirements of your assignment.

Authority / Credibility / Reliability

  • Are the author(s) considered credible and reliable?
    • What are their credentials? 
    • Are they considered experts in the field? 
    • Do other scholars cite them?

  • Is the publisher (journal) considered credible and reliable?
    • Is the journal peer-reviewed?

TIP: Google is your friend here. See what a quick Google search might tell you about the author(s) and journal.

Accuracy / Validity

  • Does the review article properly cite all referenced sources?

  • Are any seminal works missing?

TIP: Since a review article is not original research, you don’t have to worry about evaluating the accuracy/validity of the research methods and interpretations.

Purpose

  • The purpose is more straightforward for review articles than for many other types of sources.

  • The purpose of a review article is to give an overview of the current body of research on a particular topic.

  • The audience is typically other experts and students in the field.

Objectivity

  • Is there balanced coverage, where all aspects of the subject are discussed to the same level of detail?

  •  Are any assumptions or opinions made without supporting evidence?

  • What are the author(s) affiliations?  Is it possible that political viewpoints and/or religious beliefs might affect their objectivity?

Avoiding Predatory Journals

RUTGERS.EDU | SEARCH RUTGERS.EDU

© , Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Rutgers is an equal access/equal opportunity institution. Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to direct suggestions, comments, or complaints concerning any accessibility issues with Rutgers websites to accessibility@rutgers.edu or complete the Report Accessibility Barrier / Provide Feedback form.