Metrics, Conferences, Books
- Recommended Practices to Ensure Conference Content QualityDeveloped by ASCE, Elsevier, IEEE and the IET, these guidelines aim to help maintain "an equitable balance of the interests of all participants in ensuring high quality, scholarly conference proceedings content."
- Misleading MetricsA list of questionable companies claiming to provide valid scholarly metrics at the researcher, article, or journal level.
- Think.Check.Attend. checklistThink. Check. Attend is an initiative that aims to guide and assist researchers and scholars to judge the legitimacy and academic credentials of conferences in order to help them decide whether to attend.
On Good Publishing Practices
- How to Choose a Journal: Scientific and Practical ConsiderationsChapter from the book: Babor, T et al. 2017. Publishing Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed.
- 102 Things Journal Publishers DoFocusing on Value — 102 Things Journal Publishers Do (2018 Update) by Kenneth Anderson
- 96 Things Publishers DoBlog post by Kent Anderson (revised several times) with a list to show how publishers add value.
- Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing16 principles of transparency from the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association.
Read More
- Identifying Predatory or Pseudo-JournalsA document from the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) aiming " to provide guidance to help editors, researchers, funders, academic institutions and other stakeholders distinguish predatory journals from legitimate journals."
- Journal Quality ListCompiled Dr. Anne-Wil Harzing, creator of the Publish or Perish (PoP) software, this is a collation of journal rankings from a variety of sources.
- Positive and Negative Indicators of OA JournalsA listing of Open Access Journal Quality Indicators, developed by the Grand Valley State University Libraries.
Download Infographics: Phony vs. Legit
Criteria for Determining Predatory Open-Access Publishers (Infographics from the University of West Indies)