Skip to Main Content

English 101/104: College Writing/College Writing Extended

Authority (Credibility of Sources)

Authority Is Constructed and Contextual: information resources reflect their creator's expertise and credibility based on the information need and the context in which the information will be used. Authority is constructed in that various communities may recognize different types of authority. It is contextual in that the information need may help to determine the level of authority required. 

Experts view authority with an attitude of informed skepticism and an openness to new perspectives, additional voices, and changes in schools of thought. Experts know how to seek authoritative voices but also recognize that unlikely voices can be authoritative, depending on need. 

--------------

Reference

Association of College & Research Libraries. (n.d.). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework. 

Authority and Diverse Voices

To understand what makes a source authoritative, and why global perspectives and diverse points of view can be valuable, watch the following video and review the tutorial below:

  • Video: What is Authority?
  • Tutorial: Evaluating Sources for Diverse Points of View

Video: What is Authority?

Tutorial: Evaluating Sources for Diverse Points of View

Key takeaways about evaluating Authority:

There are different types of Authority (and how authority is earned):
  • Subject Expertise (academic or experienced professional)
  • Society Position (public office or public official)
  • Life Experience (has earned the credibility to speak on a topic)
The Trustworthiness of an Information Source reflects:
  • Where the information came from (publication and format)
  • Who the information was created for (scholars, general public?)
  • How the information should be used (does the information meet your needs?)
  • What is the purpose of the information (is it relevant to your research?)