Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
rutgers library logo dark

Trends in Health Care Delivery (25:705:223): Evaluating information

Designed for students in 25:705:223 to support their issues paper

Reliable information characteristics

  Good decisions require reliable information.  Using your critical thinking skills, you can evaluate the information you find to make sure it will provide a strong foundation for your decision.  Reliable information has five characteristics:

·         Accurate   -  Accurate information contains the factual evidence and conclusions that are the same or very similar to what you’ve seen in other sources on your subject.   It is also based on the author’s credentials, the nature of the publication and the date.

·         Current   Current information has been published recently.  With bioethical decisions, the timing is very important since change is taking place very rapidly.  For example, the July 2nd  issue of Science included a report from scientists at the Venter Institute on their creation of a simple organism.

·         Objective  -  Objective information includes facts and conclusions from evidence.  Information that is biased is intended to persuade or to present one point of view.  With bioethics information, you may uncover a lot of information that presents opinions.  In this case, you might look at the author's credentials and the source of the publication to consider the information's reliability rather than discarding it immediately.
Please note:  For your Trends paper, this may not have the same level of importance that it does for your research papers.

·         Provides balanced coverage  -  The information source discusses all aspects of the subject and to the same level of detail.

·         Authoritative  -  Evaulating information for authority means looking at the author and the publication.

 Other sources for evaluating information:


Cornell University's Olin Library's Evaluation Guide

Purdue’s Online Writing Lab’s Evaluating Information Guide

UC Berkeley Library’s Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply and Questions to Ask

John Hopkins University's Sheridan Libraries Evaluating Internet Information

Advice from Widener University






    Life Sciences Librarian

    Profile Photo
    Roberta Tipton
    Roberta L. Tipton
    Business Librarian
    Public Administration Librarian
    Interim Nursing Librarian
    The John Cotton Dana Library

    © , Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

    Rutgers is an equal access/equal opportunity institution. Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to direct suggestions, comments, or complaints concerning any accessibility issues with Rutgers websites to or complete the Report Accessibility Barrier / Provide Feedback form.